Harvard Science = Mad Sciene

The thing that many people do not realize is not only have they already been geoengineering the atmosphere for decades, but they have also been researching how to best market this to the public. As briefly discussed in the chapter ‘Psychology and Framing‘ (from the OpChemtrails Information Booklet), they have held many talks, meetings, surveys, panels etc to gauge how best to sway public perception and/or concerns about dumping tonnes of toxic substances into the atmosphere.

For how long will academia, media, politicians continue making excuses? When will their constant state of ignorance and denial stop? What tactics we have seen from the geoengineering establishment so far.

Denial – its not happening, people are just imagining things
Ridicule – its just a crazy conspiracy
Its accidental – oops it was an accident
Silence – if we ignore the publics concerns they’ll just go away
Intimidation & Censorship – gag orders on environmental monitoring agences, censorship of hashtags and social media accounts
Word Play – let’s keep changing the terminology and jargon to confuse people further
Climate Change Saviours – even though we don’t know the true state of the climate, let’s tell the public that by polluting the atmosphere we can prevent climate catastrophe
To Save Humanity – we want to poison the air you breath to save you
It’s cheap and easy – just no! Anyone who believes this has failed to see the big picture.

Scariest of all is the small group of people driving this grand plan. Even they admit this will potentially be harmful to humans and the environment, however, they rationalize it by proclaiming that to not understand the science is ignorant, and that we need to understand the science ‘in case’ we are forced to use it. However, many people will argue this rational is exactly what gave us the atom bomb, biological terrorism and so on. This technology has the potential to cause global disruption to natural weather and climate systems, food sources, water sources and viable land, which will inevitably lead to global conflicts and power struggles.

As this Harvard experiment will potentially affect Mexico, the notion of accountability and governance becomes even more important. This technology indiscriminately crosses boarders, so the complexity of regulation and administration alone will take decades to hash out and finalize. The scientists know this, yet, they continue with their crazy plans in haste, so blinded by personal beliefs that they have wrongly convinced themselves they are doing the right thing (just like the scientists who made the abomb).

While the public, academia, media, and politicians debate the ifs and whens and hows of ‘future’ geoengineering programs, we are left with a sky that is already under direct assault by these white coat criminals. And, by Harvard Science portraying this as the first, large scale, outdoors geoengineering experiment they are intentionally averting public attention from the fact our sky is already laden with metals and chemicals directly linked to both military and commercial aircraft. Furthermore, given Trumps attitude towards ‘climate change’, one must wonder why on earth he would allow this experiment to take place?

How much money is being put into our species adapting to the climate rather than trying to control it? Is this even about the climate, or is it more about control? After all, he who controls the weather controls the world.

When you read the articles below, please keep in mind, the people advocating geoengineering technology have been studying public reaction and perception surrounding geoengineering for years. They know how to market things in a way that makes them seem appealing, even essential. And they know how to quell the publics very realistic fears.

~ @OpChemtrails

✈UCSanDiego https://scrippsscholars.ucsd.edu/gcroberts/content/eastern-pacific-emitted-aerosol-cloud-experiment-e-peace

✈HarvardScience https://www.technologyreview.com/s/511016/a-cheap-and-easy-plan-to-stop-global-warming/

✈HarvardScience https://www.healthnutnews.com/harvard/

✈HarvardScience https://www.technologyreview.com/s/603974/harvard-scientists-moving-ahead-on-plans-for-atmospheric-geoengineering-experiments/

✈HarvardScience https://mashable.com/2017/04/19/geoengineering-research-launches-harvard-solar-radiation/

✈HarvardScience https://www.ethz.ch/en/news-and-events/eth-news/news/2015/01/geoengineering-going-outdoors.html

✈HarvardScience https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/proposed-test-stirs-debate-solar-geoengineering-180962745/

✈HarvardScience https://www.ethz.ch/en/news-and-events/eth-news/news/2015/01/geoengineering-going-outdoors.html

✈HarvardScience https://undergroundscience.net/other/harvard-scientists-plan-chemtrails-experiment-on-public/

✈HarvardScience https://bigthink.com/robby-berman/harvard-scientist-say-its-time-to-take-bioengineering-seriously

✈HarvardScience https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/18/magazine/is-it-ok-to-engineer-the-environment-to-fight-climate-change.html

✈HarvardScience https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/mar/24/us-scientists-launch-worlds-biggest-solar-geoengineering-study

✈HarvardScience https://principia-scientific.org/ominous-future-harvard-scientists-geo-engineer-stratosphere/

✈Trump https://www.theguardian.com/environment/true-north/2017/mar/27/trump-presidency-opens-door-to-planet-hacking-geoengineer-experiments

✈HarvardScience https://www.climate-engineering.eu/single/press-review-us-solar-geoengineering-field-study.html

✈Carnegie https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/programs/ccgg/index/_res/id=Attachments/index=1/C2G2%20Initiative%20.pdf

✈Trump https://www.etcgroup.org/content/trump-administration-inflates-geoengineers-balloon

✈Carnegie https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/programs/ccgg/leadership

✈HarvardScience https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=48631

✈Carnegie https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/programs/ccgg/index/_res/id=Attachments/index=0/The%20Carnegie%20Climate%20Geoengineering%20Governance%20Initiative%20Our%20Approach.pdf

✈HarvardScience https://cleantechnica.com/2017/04/03/will-geoengineering-plans-get-boost-trump-administration/

✈Carnegie https://www.carnegiecouncil.org/programs/ccgg

✈Trump https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/trump-administration-backs-geoengineering-full-disclosure-of-the-climate-engineering-atrocities-grows-near/

✈HarvardScience https://geoengineering.environment.harvard.edu/files/geoengineering/files/forum_report.pdf

✈HarvardScience https://anonhq.com/solar-geoengineering-experiment-manipulating-climate-to-begin/

✈HarvardScience https://geoengineering.environment.harvard.edu/Forum-US-Solar-Geoengineering-Research-DC-March-2017

✈HarvardScience https://www.facebook.com/GlobalMarchAgainstChemtrailsAndGeoengineering/posts/638221393052982

✈HarvardScience https://geoengineering.environment.harvard.edu/about/funding

✈HarvardScience https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?96855-Harvard-pushing-Solar-GeoEngineering-2017-Chemtrails-coordinated-by-NATO

✈HarvardScience https://geoengineering.environment.harvard.edu/about/people

✈HarvardScience https://philanthropynewyork.org/news/sloan-foundation-contributes-harvard-research-program-solar-geoengineering

✈HarvardScience https://geoengineering.environment.harvard.edu

✈HarvardScience https://www.openphilanthropy.org/focus/global-catastrophic-risks/miscellaneous/harvard-university-solar-geoengineering-research-program

✈HarvardScience https://www.ecowatch.com/harvard-geoengineering-study-2340292654.html

✈HarvardScience https://www.newstarget.com/2017-03-31-conspiracy-theory-no-more-harvard-reveals-big-oil-approved-stratospheric-injection-geoengineering.html

✈HarvardScience https://www.theinertia.com/environment/harvard-is-launching-the-largest-solar-geoengineering-study-ever/

✈HarvardScience https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2017/03/30/harvard-engineers-plan-new-real-world-geoengineering-experiment/

✈HarvardScience https://www.activistpost.com/2017/03/harvard-engineers-plan-new-real-world-geoengineering-experiment.html

✈ https://www.technologyreview.com/s/511016/a-cheap-and-easy-plan-to-stop-global-warming/

✈SPICE https://blogs.nature.com/news/2011/09/spice_put_on_ice.html

✈SPICE https://www.nature.com/news/geoengineering-experiment-cancelled-amid-patent-row-1.10645

✈HarvardScience https://www.pnas.org/content/113/52/14910.abstract

✈HarvardScience https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2016/11/geoengineering-crazy-for-sure-but-with-a-big-but/

✈HarvardScience https://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/roypta/372/2031/20140059.full.pdf

✈HarvardScience https://gwagner.com/forum-on-u-s-solar-geoengineering-research-24-march-2017/

✈HarvardScience https://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/372/2031/20140059

✈HarvardScience https://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2016/01/solar_geoengineering_is_not_a_quick_fix.html

✈HarvardScience https://www.technologyreview.com/s/603974/harvard-scientists-moving-ahead-on-plans-for-atmospheric-geoengineering-experiments/

✈HarvardScience https://yournewswire.com/harvard-scientists-chemtrails-experiment/

[This post was first published on the original OpChemtrails website on 19 May 2017]

One Reply to “Harvard Science = Mad Sciene”

Comments are closed.